options double crt nwidth=20,signif=10 nodate; ? ? AR(1) model with multiple optima (conditional ML), without ? a lagged dependent variable. Data are from: ? Dufour, J., Gaudry, M.J.I., Liem, T.C., "The Cochrane-Orcutt ? Procedure Numerical Examples of Multiple Admissible Minima," ? Economic Letters, (1980), pp.43-47. ? Additional numerical results from: ? Lovell, M.C. and Selover, D.D., "Econometric Software Accidents," ? The Economic Journal, 104, (1994), pp.713-726. ? Note: default convergence criteria were used for the ? Lovell-Selover results listed here, so they are only accurate to ? a few digits at best. Most of the TSP results should be accurate to ? roughly 10 digits, due to the special convergence criterion used. ? The global optimum conditional ML results are only accurate to ? 7-8 digits. ? load; title 'AR(1) conditional ML - local optimum'; ? TSP Lovell-Selover L-S L-S Dufour ? C -229251.31455 MicroFit RATS Shazam ? (s.e.) (84878.375624) C-O C-O,H-L DROP ? X2 2.9800902553 2.9802 2.9801 2.9807 ? (s.e.) (3.0586145327) ? X3 -660.48454300 ? (s.e.) (16889.061088) ? X4 25423.042926 ? (s.e.) (18654.766424) ? X5 2.9586236967 ? (s.e.) (4.9031908844) ? rho .32888123637 .32883 .3289 .32867 .3289 ? (s.e.) (.21116783992) ? SSR 31644512460. 3.16e+10 316644512460 3.1645e+10 3.16e+10 ? LogL -240.19975380 ar1(method=corc,tol=1e-11,maxit=100) yee c x2 x3 x4 x5; title 'AR(1) conditional ML - global optimum'; ? TSP Lovell-Selover Dufour-Gaudry-Liem ? C 534114.58201 Shazam ? (s.e.) (359433.21576) GS DROP ? X2 -2.8527903125 -2.8334 ? (s.e.) (3.3906736496) ? X3 -12065.619763 ? (s.e.) (14586.038716) ? X4 18161.171798 ? (s.e.) (16908.015761) ? X5 -5.2060324726 ? (s.e.) (4.9899718122) ? rho .93187031452 .93 .9318 ? (s.e.) (.08112265926) ? SSR 31124698199. 3.1126e+10 3.11e+10 ? LogL -240.03412287 ar1(method=corc,rstart=.9,tol=1e-11,maxit=100) yee c x2 x3 x4 x5; ? Estimate conditional ML directly via nonlinear least squares, ? after explicitly dropping first observation. ? From the non-convergence warning message, we can see that the ? TSP results are accurate to 7-8 digits, not 10-11 as was hoped for. smpl 1901,1920; form(param,varpref=b) ar1; lsq(tol=1e-11,maxsqz=25) ar1; title 'AR(1) exact ML - only one optimum'; ? TSP Lovell-Selover L-S L-S ? C -225488.67731 MicroFit RATS Shazam ? (s.e.) (72724.053866) Exact B-M ML ? X2 3.0562664848 3.0562 3.0563 3.0566 ? (s.e.) (2.9368181062) ? X3 -1851.3618057 ? (s.e.) (12893.309076) ? X4 26097.620409 ? (s.e.) (16608.225127) ? X5 2.8057272628 ? (s.e.) (4.4982772910) ? rho .31660006021 .31661 .3166 .31649 ? (s.e.) (.23827283644) ? LogL -251.76161355 smpl 1900,1920; ar1(tol=1e-11,maxit=100) yee c x2 x3 x4 x5; ? Can also verify that grid search detects the global optimum ? for conditional ML ar1(method=hilu,rstep=.05) yee c x2 x3 x4 x5; end; noprint; freq a; smpl 1900 1920; load yee x2 x3 x4 x5; 41257.19 31029.69 5.28 6.81 63.77 44865.40 32583.78 6.06 6.87 85.57 22923.50 36650.81 8.87 7.32 88.46 32965.03 36891.94 9.47 7.08 386.20 54792.10 42317.09 9.22 7.30 290.85 33108.06 40589.08 9.83 7.36 393.46 39056.50 41118.95 10.22 7.34 765.05 172234.73 40704.33 9.92 8.36 442.37 156048.66 47811.32 10.16 8.47 913.72 119613.33 46579.47 9.10 7.28 2750.65 101615.00 52399.32 9.20 7.51 730.62 140263.66 52394.25 9.22 7.51 5598.61 157970.33 53433.06 8.92 8.12 11172.30 153197.00 57034.16 10.10 8.10 11231.01 220405.33 63357.77 13.04 9.10 1998.53 221200.00 62331.26 12.92 11.14 1840.21 149608.33 65005.41 13.83 11.51 1527.44 230434.33 65754.51 13.63 11.34 1829.89 250505.66 69541.05 14.04 10.83 2691.17 294424.66 60494.35 13.24 10.22 3225.85 281281.66 63381.69 12.67 10.36 3980.40